Order book liquidity and liquidation heatmaps
Identify what a heatmap measures, reconcile walls with trades, calculate slippage and evaluate sweeps without assuming a guaranteed reversal.
What you will practise
Turn a visible liquidity feature into a specific, falsifiable execution or market-structure question.
Before you start
- Understand market versus limit orders and stop execution.
- Know the difference between traded volume and open interest.
Course outline
- 1
Distinguish order-book liquidity from liquidation heatmaps
A bright band can be a resting order, a modelled liquidation level or a reported event. Read units, coverage and display settings before interpreting a heatmap.
8 minIn short: An order-book heatmap shows displayed resting orders that can still be cancelled; an estimated liquidation heatmap projects possible levels from assumptions about entries, leverage and margin; a realised layer aggregates reported forced-close events. Read units, relative scale and coverage first, and do not add these values together.
- 2
Track whether an order-book wall traded or disappeared
Reconcile displayed depth with executed trades. An 800-unit wall reduction is not 800 units traded, and a shrinking wall proves neither a fill nor a spoof.
8 minIn short: A shrinking order-book wall can reflect trades, cancellations, repricing or a data update. Ending size = starting size + additions − cancellations − executions. An ask falling from 1,000 to 200 units with 100 units executed implies a net withdrawal of 700 units, which proves neither a fill nor a spoof.
- 3
Calculate execution VWAP by walking order-book depth
Walk a market order through order-book depth. Calculate the average execution price (VWAP) and slippage in basis points before costs outweigh the setup.
8 minIn short: A buy walks the asks from the lowest price up until the quantity is filled. Execution VWAP = sum of price × filled quantity ÷ total filled quantity, and slippage in basis points = (VWAP − P) ÷ P × 10,000 against a stated reference P. Fees are added separately.
- 4
Evaluate a liquidation cascade without calling a bottom
Separate forced-close evidence from a reversal hypothesis. Compare continuation and reclaim paths after price and open interest fall together.
8 minIn short: A liquidation cascade shows forced position reductions, not that the last forced seller has finished. After price and OI fall together, predefine both paths: a recovery needs its own reclaim test, such as two five-minute closes above a level and a retest that holds, while repeated failed reclaims keep continuation open.
- 5
Plan a liquidity sweep and reclaim as a testable setup
Define the reference level, sweep, reclaim and invalidation before entry. See how a 2:1 chart ratio becomes 1.5:1 after costs, and log failed sweeps too.
8 minIn short: Define the reference level, how far price must trade beyond it, the reclaim condition and the invalidation before the wick forms; a sweep does not prove that stop-loss orders were resting there. Then recalculate after costs: 2.00 reward and 1.00 risk with 0.20 costs per unit give 1.80 ÷ 1.20 = 1.5, not 2.
Calculators used in this course
Related courses
- Order flow and CVD: absorption, footprints and data qualityCalculate delta from trades, compare spot and perpetual activity and distinguish a useful observation from a feed or classification artefact.
- Crypto liquidation data: audit what an event measuresReconcile liquidation sides, price bases, quantities, replayed observations and coverage limits using original event ledgers and explained exercises.
- Order execution mechanics: from orders to actual fillsWork through quantity rounding, maker queues, partial IOC exits, trigger sources and implementation shortfall with original ledgers and reconciled calculations.
Open full-size diagram- Distinguish order-book liquidity from liquidation heatmaps
- Track whether an order-book wall traded or disappeared
- Calculate execution VWAP by walking order-book depth
- Evaluate a liquidation cascade without calling a bottom
- Plan a liquidity sweep and reclaim as a testable setup
Educational material. Examples do not establish a profitable strategy. Trading costs, gaps and liquidation can produce losses beyond a planned stop.