7 days Pro+ free · no cardStart my free trial

Crypto margin and collateral: reconcile account exposure · 4 / 5

Maintenance margin tiers: apply the rate and deduction

A higher marginal maintenance rate does not automatically apply to every unit of the position. Omitting a required deduction can manufacture a jump that the stated schedule does not contain.

Athenum7 minUpdated:

Tiered maintenance margin formula: rate × notional − deduction

Use an invented schedule for positive marked notional N up to 20,000 USDT. The first 10,000 requires 1%; the portion above 10,000 through 20,000 requires 2%. Exactly 10,000 belongs to the first tier. There are no open orders or estimated closing-fee reserves in this model.

For 10,000 < N ≤ 20,000, calculate 10,000 × 0.01 + (N − 10,000) × 0.02. Expanding gives 0.02N − 100. The 100 deduction preserves the first slice's lower rate; it is not an optional discount or additional collateral.

How a mark price move changes the maintenance tier

Hold quantity at 100 units while the mark moves from 99 to 101 USDT per unit. Notional moves from 9,900 to 10,100 without another trade. Under this schedule, maintenance rises from 99 to 102. A tier transition can therefore occur through valuation alone.

This does not establish that the account became less safe. Position P&L, collateral value and other requirements may also change. Real venues have product-specific notional definitions, order reserves, fee treatment and rounding. The example's output is one component, not a complete liquidation threshold.

Example: maintenance margin at 10,000, 10,100 and 15,000

At notional 10,000, requirement is 100. At 10,100, it is 100 plus 2 on the additional 100, giving 102. Applying 2% to everything would give 202, an overstatement of 100.

At 15,000, the first slice requires 100 and the extra 5,000 requires another 100. The shortcut agrees: 15,000 × 0.02 − 100 = 200. An independent slice calculation is a useful review of a rate-and-deduction table.

Original schedule; requirements in USDT; no extrapolation above 20,000
Marked notionalProgressive requirementEquivalent calculation
9,900999,900 × 1%
10,00010010,000 × 1%
10,10010210,100 × 2% − 100
15,00020015,000 × 2% − 100
Bars show maintenance in USDT for the stated notional, not position size. Crossing 10,000 raises the requirement from 100 to 102 at 10,100; the deduction prevents an artificial jump to 202. The schedule is hypothetical.Open full-size diagram
  1. Notional: 9,900 USDT: 99 USDT
  2. Notional: 10,000 USDT: 100 USDT
  3. Notional: 10,100 USDT: 102 USDT
  4. Notional: 15,000 USDT: 200 USDT
Bars show maintenance in USDT for the stated notional, not position size. Crossing 10,000 raises the requirement from 100 to 102 at 10,100; the deduction prevents an artificial jump to 202. The schedule is hypothetical.
Bars show maintenance in USDT for the stated notional, not position size. Crossing 10,000 raises the requirement from 100 to 102 at 10,100; the deduction prevents an artificial jump to 202. The schedule is hypothetical.

Original schedule; requirements in USDT; no extrapolation above 20,000. Bars show maintenance in USDT for the stated notional, not position size. Crossing 10,000 raises the requirement from 100 to 102 at 10,100; the deduction prevents an artificial jump to 202. The schedule is hypothetical.

N: Marked notional. M: Progressive requirement.

Mistake: reusing a tier formula for orders or other venues

Do not copy a position-maintenance formula into an order requirement or assume another venue uses the same boundaries. Record product, account mode, effective rule version and omitted costs before using real settings. Our invented 1% and 2% rates are not current symbol parameters.

Before acting

  • Use the specified marked-notional definition.
  • Check inclusive and exclusive boundaries.
  • Reconcile slices with the deduction formula.
  • Keep order and closing-fee requirements separate.
  • Compare full account equity before making a risk conclusion.

Check your understanding

At marked notional 12,500, what is maintenance under the exercise schedule? Explain why 250 is wrong.

Show the explained answer

The first 10,000 requires 100 and the remaining 2,500 requires 50, so the result is 150 USDT. The equivalent shortcut is 12,500 × 2% − 100 = 150. A result of 250 incorrectly applies the second slice's rate to the entire position.

Sources and further reading

Continue with Athenum

From the Athenum blog

Crypto Margin Calculator: How to Calculate Required Margin, Isolated vs Cross, and Liquidation Buffer

Related lessons

Related courses