Chart pattern success rates: audit the full record
Audit pattern success rates, measured targets, re-entry losses, zero-event samples and unresolved outcomes with original calculations and diagrams.
What you will practise
Evaluate a pattern claim using a defined sample, executable trading rules and a complete accounting of uncertainty.
Before you start
- Understand stops, position size and costs in a linear instrument.
- Complete the introductory risk and strategy-validation lessons.
Course outline
- 1
Audit the denominator behind a chart-pattern success rate
One hundred candidates, sixty entries, twenty-four wins. Separate candidates, qualified entries, target touches and profitable trades before quoting a rate.
7 minIn short: A pattern success rate needs a stated event and denominator: candidates, qualified entries, target touches or target-before-stop wins. With 100 candidates, 60 entries and 24 wins, the eventual-touch rate among entries is 60% but the win rate is 40%, and the net result is 6R after 0.1R cost per trade.
- 2
Calculate a flag target from explicit reference points
Half the prior move can give a target of 128 or 135. Separate price-difference and percentage projections, then measure reward and risk from the actual entry.
6 minIn short: Half the prior move can mean half the price difference or half the percentage change. For an 80 to 120 move projected from 108, the absolute rule gives 108 + 20 = 128 and the percentage rule 108 × 1.25 = 135. Measure reward and risk from the executable entry.
- 3
Reconcile a stopped trade and re-entry as one complete episode
A 29.47 USDT winner can leave an episode profit of only 8.98 USDT. Count the first stopped trade, every fee and the remaining risk budget before re-entering.
7 minIn short: A re-entry result includes the first stopped trade and every fee: a 20.49 USDT net loss plus a 29.47 USDT net win leaves 8.98 USDT. Under a fixed episode loss budget, size the next attempt from the remaining budget and the new stop distance.
- 4
Zero observed failures do not mean zero risk
Twenty selected examples without a failure prove little. Calculate what a sample with zero observed failures can establish and check how it was selected.
7 minIn short: Zero observed failures in n trials is an observed frequency of 0, not zero risk. Under a binomial model with independent, fully observed trials, the one-sided upper 95% bound is 1 − 0.05^(1/n): about 13.91% for n = 20 and 0.994% for n = 300.
- 5
Keep unresolved chart-pattern outcomes in the evaluation
Separate completed and still-open observations in a pattern evaluation. Calculate transparent bounds without pretending open price paths are wins or losses.
6 minIn short: Keep unresolved observations visible instead of dropping them or counting them as wins or losses. With 6 successes, 1 stop and 3 unresolved cases, the completed-case rate is 6 / 7 ≈ 85.71%, while the final rate for all ten can only be bounded between 60% and 90%.
Calculators used in this course
Related courses
- Backtest bias: validate a trading strategy without hindsightAudit signal timing, ambiguous fills, confirmation filters, parameter searches and chronological holdouts with reproducible worked cases.
- Backtest statistics: test what a trading result really saysInterpret compounding, profit factor, overlapping trades, net benchmarks and bootstrap assumptions with independently calculated examples.
- Indicator mechanics: RSI, EMA, FVG and Parabolic SARCalculate RSI, ZLEMA, candle-gap geometry, Parabolic SAR and EMA warm-up with reproducible examples before assigning trading meaning to their labels.
Open full-size diagram- Audit the denominator behind a chart-pattern success rate
- Calculate a flag target from explicit reference points
- Reconcile a stopped trade and re-entry as one complete episode
- Zero observed failures do not mean zero risk
- Keep unresolved chart-pattern outcomes in the evaluation
Educational material. Examples do not establish a profitable strategy. Trading costs, gaps and liquidation can produce losses beyond a planned stop.