7 days Pro+ free · no cardStart my free trial

Funding rate research: reconcile payments and hedges

Explain funding forecast errors, reconstruct changed settlement schedules, attribute OI-weighted rates and calculate borrowing and hedge-exit scenarios.

What you will practise

Build an auditable funding ledger and separate changes in rates, exposure, market weights and future carrying costs before comparing hedge decisions.

Before you start

  • Complete Funding and basis, including the full spot–perpetual ledger.
  • Understand linear contract notional, signed cash flows, basis points and open-interest units.

Course outline

  1. 1

    Funding forecast vs payment: explain the rate and exposure gap

    A 30 USDT funding estimate became a 12 USDT receipt. Separate the rate change from the exposure change and reconcile the account's actual funding entry.

    9 min

    In short: A funding payment differs from its forecast when the settled rate, the eligible notional or both change. With s = +1 for a short and −1 for a long, rate effect = s × N0 × (r1 − r0) and exposure effect = s × (N1 − N0) × r1; they sum to the gap.

  2. 2

    Funding interval changes: rebuild the actual settlement ledger

    Reconstruct a holding window across an 8-hour-to-hourly funding change. Match effective schedules, eligible positions, settled rates and posted payments.

    8 min

    In short: After a switch from eight-hour to hourly funding, list each settlement timestamp under the schedule version in force, attach the eligible notional and settled rate, and sum the signed payments. Multiplying the entry-time rate by the old settlement count misses events; applying today's interval to past windows invents them.

  3. 3

    OI-weighted funding: separate rate changes from changing weights

    Both venue rates fell, yet the OI-weighted index rose 1.4 basis points. Separate the rate effect from the weight effect on a consistent venue panel.

    9 min

    In short: An OI-weighted funding index R = Σ(w × r) can rise while every venue's rate falls if weight shifts to higher-rate venues. Split R1 − R0 into a rate effect, Σ[w0 × (r1 − r0)], and a weight effect, Σ[(w1 − w0) × r1]: −1.0 + 2.4 = +1.4 basis points.

  4. 4

    Funding minus borrow costs: account for rate resets and repayment

    Calculate net carry from actual funding and a changing loan balance. Include hourly rate resets, partial repayment and interest after the trade closes.

    9 min

    In short: Net carry = funding received − funding paid − loan interest, in one currency and window. Charge interest per billing period on the actual interest-bearing balance at that period's rate, and keep the loan ledger open until repayment is confirmed, not until the trade closes. Repaid principal is not an expense.

  5. 5

    Funding turns negative: compare holding a hedge with closing it

    A negative funding rate does not decide the exit alone. Compare holding and closing a spot–perp hedge from the decision time, ignoring funding already earned.

    10 min

    In short: Compare holding and closing from the decision time, excluding funding already received because both branches keep it. Waiting yields current basis − exit basis + signed future funding − borrowing − exit costs; in the example, basis must narrow from 120 to 92 just to tie closing now.

Calculators used in this course

Related courses

Build an auditable funding ledger and separate changes in rates, exposure, market weights and future carrying costs before comparing hedge decisions.Open full-size diagram
  1. Funding forecast vs payment: explain the rate and exposure gap
  2. Funding interval changes: rebuild the actual settlement ledger
  3. OI-weighted funding: separate rate changes from changing weights
  4. Funding minus borrow costs: account for rate resets and repayment
  5. Funding turns negative: compare holding a hedge with closing it
Build an auditable funding ledger and separate changes in rates, exposure, market weights and future carrying costs before comparing hedge decisions.

Educational material. Examples do not establish a profitable strategy. Trading costs, gaps and liquidation can produce losses beyond a planned stop.